Restoring for a resilient future: Woodland community assembly trajectories in the face of multiple stressors

Find Similar History 31 Claim Ownership Request Data Change Add Favourite

Title
Restoring for a resilient future: Woodland community assembly trajectories in the face of multiple stressors

CoPED ID
1e9f8950-c758-4da3-89c5-b816bb6f6ba0

Status
Active

Funder

Value
No funds listed.

Start Date
Sept. 30, 2022

End Date
March 29, 2026

Description

More Like This


Ecosystem restoration is proposed internationally as a nature-based climate solution. The UK aims to plant
50,000 ha trees per year by 2035. This planting has multiple aims: addressing biodiversity loss, increasing
carbon storage and reaching Net Zero, and bolstering associated ecosystem service co-benefits. The
direction that restoration trajectories take towards these aims depends upon multiple stressors, including
drought and land degradation legacies, for instance dominant vegetation that can arrest woodland
succession. However, an important stressor - surface-level ozone - remains overlooked. This is despite
evidence of ozone-induced declines in net primary productivity of near 50%. This suggests that the presence
of ozone could seriously compromise multiple restoration goals, particularly Net Zero.
We know, for individual trees, that ozone can impair stomatal control and reduce root-to-shoot ratios. This
makes ozone-affected plants more susceptible to stressors such as drought, and alters water and nutrientuptake relationships. However, we have very limited knowledge of how ozone, when combined with other
stressors, influences community assembly restoration trajectories. We hypothesize that initial restoration
trajectories in the context of multiple stressors will depend on the functional traits of species involved. This
is because environmental filters (i.e. different stressors) can act on the distribution of functional traits. At
the same time, stress can alter epigenetics and gene expression with consequences for plant function.
This PhD, using experiments and cutting-edge analytical techniques, asks:
Does ozone create greater divergence in initial woodland community restoration trajectories in the
presence of additional stressors (drought, co-occurring weed species)?
Can relationships among functional traits, ecophysiology and epigenetic mechanisms explain
divergent restoration trajectories?
Ultimately, answering these fundamental science questions will help inform tree-planting interventions and
modelling initiatives to ensure resilient restoration trajectories beyond the UN Decade of Ecosystem
Restoration.

Andrew Smith SUPER_PER
Jack Atkin-Willoughby STUDENT_PER

Subjects by relevance
  1. Ozone
  2. Environmental rehabilitation
  3. Plants
  4. Ecosystems (ecology)
  5. Nature conservation
  6. Climate changes
  7. Stress (biological phenomena)

Extracted key phrases
  1. Community assembly restoration trajectory
  2. Initial woodland community restoration trajectory
  3. Woodland community assembly trajectory
  4. Resilient restoration trajectory
  5. Multiple restoration goal
  6. Multiple stressor
  7. Ecosystem restoration
  8. Initial restoration
  9. Multiple aim
  10. Resilient future
  11. Additional stressor
  12. Important stressor
  13. Different stressor
  14. Level ozone
  15. Associated ecosystem service co

Related Pages

UKRI project entry

UK Project Locations