Filling the gap: a UK-based assessment of the Perth Wave Energy Project

Find Similar History 13 Claim Ownership Request Data Change Add Favourite

Title
Filling the gap: a UK-based assessment of the Perth Wave Energy Project

CoPED ID
559e6804-9b19-4fac-9206-90b595482221

Status
Closed


Value
£66,040

Start Date
Feb. 3, 2014

End Date
Aug. 2, 2014

Description

More Like This


The Scottish and UK governments have set ambitious targets on renewable energy, with 50% of electricity to be generated by renewable sources in Scotland by 2015, and 15% of the UK's total energy consumption to be from renewable sources by 2020. The UK has one of the richest wave energy resources in the world, and technologies are rapidly moving towards commercial-scale developments in order to harness this power. Substantial industry investment is needed to sustain the pace of development, but in the current financial climate investors have become more averse to risk and/or uncertainty.

In Australia, however, the Carnegie Perth Wave Energy Project (PWEP) will be the world's first grid and water infrastructure connected wave energy array, made up of three Carnegie Wave Energy Ltd. CETO devices. This level of development has not been achieved in the UK, despite our position as 'market leader'. This represents a significant international knowledge exchange opportunity from scientific, industrial, and regulatory perspectives.

Proposed wave energy projects must carry out a detailed environmental impact assessment (EIA) before any development phase can begin. The EIA is often based on information from a baseline survey, fed into models and used to predict any potential environmental impacts which must be mitigated and/or monitored throughout the life of the wave energy project. Complying with EIA regulations can be an unpredictable, costly and resource intensive process for developers in the UK, and one which can affect outside investment into a project.

Are Australian regulations less rigorous, or are the processes followed less cumbersome and more streamlined? Or are Australian companies more effective at achieving environmental consent? By assessing how the PWEP would fare against UK regulations, this internship will begin to answer these questions. Furthermore, gaps or areas of academic uncertainty within PWEP-type projects which could hold up the EIA and consenting process will be identified. By developing specific, well-thought-out, quantitative studies around the identified gaps, this internship will go some way towards reducing scientific uncertainty around wave energy projects.

This will go some way towards reducing the unpredictable nature of the EIA and consenting process for wave energy developments, making the UK more attractive to internal and international investors, building capacity within the UK industry to achieve the stated government renewable energy targets.

Raeanne Miller PI_PER
Raeanne Miller FELLOW_PER

Subjects by relevance
  1. Renewable energy sources
  2. Environmental effects
  3. Wave energy
  4. Energy
  5. Sustainable development
  6. Investors
  7. Uncertainty

Extracted key phrases
  1. Wave energy development
  2. Wave energy project
  3. Carnegie Perth Wave Energy Project
  4. Government renewable energy target
  5. Rich wave energy resource
  6. UK regulation
  7. Wave energy array
  8. UK government
  9. UK industry
  10. Carnegie Wave Energy Ltd. CETO device
  11. Total energy consumption
  12. Detailed environmental impact assessment
  13. EIA regulation
  14. Gap
  15. Renewable source

Related Pages

UKRI project entry

UK Project Locations